Menu
![Cast software vs sonarqube api example Cast software vs sonarqube api example](https://www.castsoftware.com/images/hp2017/Imaging_system_icon.png)
![Cast Software Vs Sonarqube Apio Cast Software Vs Sonarqube Apio](/uploads/1/2/5/6/125619441/442102096.jpg)
Recommendations As you may see in the direct comparison — the three tools have some aspects and/or rules in common, but they give just in the combination 100% functionality you may need in your project. In the beginning (first weeks) the best is to start with Findbugs. You will not have a lot discussions about the warnings with the developers.
Almost all warnings of Findbugs are without any doubt possible defects or things which are harmful in some way. After the developers are used to work with static code analysis you should start with some PMD rules and later with the more style questions from Checkstyle. Be careful with the Checkstyle rules - just activate what is really necessary and accepted by the team. My recommended way to use the three tools is Codehaus Sonar. The dashboard of Sonar summaries the results in one report, enables to manage a central rule set and an excellent Eclipse Plug-in for local analysis is available. The standalone client of Findbugs can be used to analyze Java byte code in the case the source code is not available, e.g., to get an impression about the quality of 3 rd party libraries.
Cast Software Vs Sonarqube Api. This article will demonstrate how to integrate SonarLint with Visual Studio 2015. SonarLint is a tool for managing code quality. So that’s a total of 60 analysis ). In the following tables you can find some information about the code coverage tools and some basic metrics about the selected projects.